Vespid Heterodonyx

From Unbroken Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Vespid Heterodonyx
Vespid.png
Vespid, as he was rendered in the 2008 video game, Spore.
Species Keilicaela
Factions Keilicaela Empire, Armada of Namine's Fire, Terreki Conglomerate (formerly), Terreki Resistance (formerly)
Age 55 Galactic Standard Years
Status Alive
Height 8'0
Weight Unknown


Vespid Heterodonyx, a former AI programmer, is considered by many to be Unbroken's main character. He is the current Supreme Commander of the Keilicaela Empire.

Early Life

Vespid was born in 931 PRE.

(To be expanded upon.)

Personality

Vespid's once bright, sarcastic, and joking demeanor has been worn down by years of tragedy, death, and destruction, leaving what could be described as a shell. Despite this, what remains of the Keilicaela he once was still manages to shine through, and it does so the most when he is with Thisposa, the person he cares about the most in this universe. A natural born leader and a logical thinker, Vespid turned out to be one of the Keilicaela Empire's best Supreme Commanders--even if he resents the role. Vespid's head may be in the present, but his feet are planted firmly in the past. He longs for the life he once had, a life that may never be reclaimed in a post-Corruption universe.

Appearance

Like most Keilicaela, Vespid does not belong exclusively or wholly to one particular subspecies; rather, he is a mixed breed. His large 8-foot-tall height suggests that he is part Aen-Keilicaela, while his exoskeleton's green hue is a trait possessed by Chi-Keilicaela.

Vespid bears a large scar on his right forearm where a Corruption Ravenger clamped its six-pronged mandibles down. He is also rarely seen without his Adaptive Combat Harness equipped.

Trivia

  • Vespid has a clinical addiction to Twinkies.[1]
  • As a running gag, a majority of walls Vespid leans against fall over. As such, he is not a huge fan of leaning against things, often pressing against an object with his hand to test its stability before doing so.

Notes

  1. The canonicity of this claim is questionable at best.